PortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and ^GSPC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DSI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DSI:

0.56

^GSPC:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

DSI:

0.94

^GSPC:

1.00

Omega Ratio

DSI:

1.13

^GSPC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

DSI:

0.57

^GSPC:

0.64

Martin Ratio

DSI:

1.97

^GSPC:

2.45

Ulcer Index

DSI:

5.96%

^GSPC:

4.96%

Daily Std Dev

DSI:

20.59%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

DSI:

-54.23%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

DSI:

-3.55%

^GSPC:

-3.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DSI has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.55%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.


DSI

YTD

1.18%

1M

15.12%

6M

-0.84%

1Y

11.36%

3Y*

16.21%

5Y*

16.07%

10Y*

12.55%

^GSPC

YTD

1.00%

1M

12.45%

6M

0.40%

1Y

11.91%

3Y*

15.05%

5Y*

15.04%

10Y*

10.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF

S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DSI vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DSI is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DSI is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DSI is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DSI is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DSI is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DSI is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DSI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DSI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...